Does the manufacturer need to recall the product if it cannot fix a vulnerability?
From the placing on the market and for the support period, manufacturers who know or have reason to believe that the product with digital elements or the processes put in place by the manufacturer are not in conformity with the essential cybersecurity requirements set out in Annex I shall immediately take the corrective measures necessary to bring that product with digital elements or the manufacturer’s processes into conformity, or to withdraw or recall the product, as appropriate (Article 13(21)).
As explained in 4.3.1 Are manufacturers required to patch all vulnerabilities that are discovered during the support period?, the manufacturer is required, in relation to the risks posed, to address and remediate vulnerabilities during the support period. Appropriate remedies can take different forms, including mitigation measures.
In some circumstances, however, it is possible that a vulnerability that presents a very significant risk of compromise, particularly in a hardware product with digital elements, cannot be addressed and remediated adequately and the product cannot be brought back into conformity. In such cases, which are likely to be exceptional cases, the manufacturer may be required to withdraw or recall the product, as appropriate.
It is likely that, in such circumstances, the relevant market surveillance authorities are involved and that the relevant procedures laid down in Articles 54-58 of the CRA are activated.
Disclaimer
Disclaimer: This document is prepared by the Commission services and should not be considered as representative of the European Commission’s official position. The replies to the FAQs do not extend in any way the rights and obligations deriving from applicable legislation nor introduce any additional requirement. The expressed views are not authoritative and cannot prejudge any future actions the European Commission may take, including potential positions before the Court of Justice of the European Union, which is competent to authoritatively interpret Union law.