Does a manufacturer need to implement all the essential requirements?

Manufacturers need to comply with all essential cybersecurity requirements related to vulnerability handling (set out in Part II of Annex I) throughout the product’s support period. However, with regards to essential cybersecurity requirements related to the product properties (set out in Part I of Annex I), manufacturers need to determine on the basis of the cybersecurity risk assessment which of those requirements are relevant for the type of product with digital elements concerned. In accordance with Article 13(4), where certain essential cybersecurity requirements are not applicable to a product with digital elements, the manufacturer should include a clear justification in the

cybersecurity risk assessment included in the technical documentation. This could be the case where an essential cybersecurity requirement is incompatible with the nature of a product with digital elements (see recital 55), or where no risks exist that require a mitigation in relation to that essential requirement.

For example, a product might not need to incorporate any specific mitigation measures related to the protection of personal data if the product’s intended purpose and reasonably foreseeable use do not include the processing of any kind of personal data. In such cases, the product might still have the technical capability to process some kinds of personal data, but such use would not be included in the intended purpose and reasonably foreseeable use declared by the manufacturer. Where the product’s technical capability to process personal data may lead to significant cybersecurity risks in the case of reasonably foreseeable misuse, the information and instructions to the user may need to include this information, in accordance with point 5 of Annex II of the CRA.

For example, as stated in recital 55, the intended purpose of a product with digital elements may require the manufacturer to follow widely recognised interoperability standards even if its security features are no longer considered to be state of the art. Similarly, other Union law requires manufacturers to apply specific interoperability requirements. Where this is the case, having the effect that an essential cybersecurity requirement is not applicable to a product with digital elements, but the manufacturer has identified cybersecurity risks in relation to that essential cybersecurity requirement, it should take measures to address those risks by other means, for instance by limiting the intended purpose of the product to trusted environments and/or by informing the users about those risks.

© 2025 European Union • CC-BY 4.0 • “FAQs on the Cyber Resilience Act” p.27–28 (PDF) •
Disclaimer

Disclaimer: This document is prepared by the Commission services and should not be considered as representative of the European Commission’s official position. The replies to the FAQs do not extend in any way the rights and obligations deriving from applicable legislation nor introduce any additional requirement. The expressed views are not authoritative and cannot prejudge any future actions the European Commission may take, including potential positions before the Court of Justice of the European Union, which is competent to authoritatively interpret Union law.